Methods
Study design and participants
Participants were recruited through advertisements and screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection with nucleic acid and serology tests (spike-RBD-specific IgG or IgM). All participants had a screening visit in which a full medical history and examination were taken in addition to blood and urine tests (treponema pallidum, HIV, hepatitis B and C serology, kidney and liver function tests, full blood count, urinary screen for blood, protein, and glucose, and a pregnancy test done in women of childbearing potential). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before enrolment.
The protocol and informed consent were approved by the Clinical Trial Ethics Committee of Shulan (Hangzhou) hospital (YW2020-031-01). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice.
Randomisation and masking
The trial consisted of five blocks. Participants in each block were randomly assigned (5:1) to the ARCoV vaccine or placebo. Statisticians performed randomisation using SAS (version 9.4). The randomisation code was assigned to each participant in sequence in order of enrolment and then the participants received the investigational products labelled with the same code. The vaccine and placebo were indistinguishable in appearance. All participants, investigators, and staff doing laboratory analyses were masked to treatment allocation.
Procedures
- Zhang NN
- Li XF
- Deng YQ
- et al.
The vaccine was administered in the deltoid muscle on day 0 and day 28. Placebo was saline solution (0·9% sodium chloride, Suzhou Abogen Biosciences).
Outcomes
The primary endpoint for safety was incidence of adverse events or adverse reactions within 60 min, and at days 7, 14, and 28 after each vaccine dose. The secondary endpoint for safety was abnormal changes in laboratory tests at days 1, 4, 7, and 28 after each vaccine dose. For immunogenicity, the secondary endpoint was titres of neutralising antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2, neutralising antibodies to a pseudovirus, and RBD-specific IgG at baseline and 28 days after the first vaccination and at days 7, 15, and 28 after the second vaccination. The exploratory endpoint was T-cell responses at 7 days after the first vaccination and at days 7 and 15 after the second vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as a change from seronegative at the lower limit of quantification to seropositive, or a fourfold titre increase if the participant was seropositive at the lower limit of quantification. Regarding the ELISpot measured T-cell response, the results were expressed as the number of spot-forming cells per 1 000 000 cells, which was 50 or more and twice the negative control that was considered positive.
Statistical analysis
We assessed the safety endpoints in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one vaccine dose. We analysed the number and proportion of participants with adverse reactions after vaccination and compared safety profiles across the dose groups. We assessed immunogenic endpoints in the per-protocol population, who completed their assigned two-dose vaccination schedule and with available antibodies results.
The sample size was not determined on the basis of statistical power calculations. The National Medical Products Administration of China recommended a minimum sample size of 20–30 participants for a pilot vaccine trial. Measurement data were expressed as mean (SD) or geometric mean and counting data or grade data were expressed as frequency. Statistical analysis of multiple mean was performed using unpaired t test or one-way ANOVA, and statistical analysis of categorical outcomes was done by Pearson χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Hypothesis testing was two sided and significance was defined as p value less than 0·05.
An independent data and safety monitoring committee, consisting of an independent statistician, clinician, epidemiologist, and statistical expert, was established before the start of the trial. Safety data for 14 days and 28 days after the second vaccination was assessed and reviewed by the committee.
Role of the funding source
The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the article.
Results
Table 1Baseline demographic characteristics in phase 1
Data are n (%), mean (SD), or median (IQR).
Table 2Solicited adverse reactions for 7 days after first or second vaccinations, and unsolicited adverse reactions until day 56, graded by US Food and Drug Administration criteria in phase 1
Data are n (%). CRP=C-reactive protein. URI=upper respiratory tract infection. UTI=urinary tract infection.
Table 3Solicited adverse reactions for 14 days after first or second vaccinations, and unsolicited adverse reactions until day 56, graded by National Medical Products Administration criteria in phase 1
Data are n (%). CRP=C-reactive protein. URI=upper respiratory tract infection. UTI=urinary tract infection.
- Kamphuis E
- Junt T
- Waibler Z
- Forster R
- Kalinke U
and concentrations of C-reactive protein
- Tsai MY
- Hanson NQ
- Straka RJ
- et al.
,
- Doener F
- Hong HS
- Meyer I
- et al.
reported as pharmacodynamics markers after administration of mRNA vaccines against influenza and rabies.
After first immunisation only a few participants developed low titres of neutralising antibodies, whereas after the second immunisation most participants developed high titres of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies (figure 2B). 28 days after the second vaccination, seroconversion rates increased to 17 (85%) of 20 participants in the 5 μg group, 18 (90%) of 20 in the 10 μg group, 20 (100%) of 20 in the 15 μg group, 19 (95%) of 20 in the 20 μg group, and 14 (88%) of 16 in the 25 μg group. In the 5 μg, 10 μg, and 15 μg groups, geometric mean titres of the pseudovirus 50% neutralising antibodies significantly increased by day 15 and peaked at day 28 after the second vaccination, whereas in the 20 μg and 25 μg groups, titres peaked at day 15 then declined slightly at day 28 after second vaccination (figure 2B). The peak titre of neutralising antibodies was detected in the 15 μg group, and geometric mean titres reached 250·9 and 289·7 ELISA units at days 15 and 28 after second vaccination, respectively.
Discussion
- Li J
- Hui A
- Zhang X
- et al.
The incidence of grade 3 fever of BNT162b1 varied significantly in the same 30 μg group in adults aged 18–55 years, with none (0%) of 12 in the USA,
- Walsh EE
- Frenck Jr, RW
- Falsey AR
- et al.
one (8%) of 12 in Germany,
- Mulligan MJ
- Lyke KE
- Kitchin N
- et al.
and four (17%) of 24 in China,
- Li J
- Hui A
- Zhang X
- et al.
suggesting varying tolerability in different populations. Additionally, the incidence of grade 3 fever of the two spike protein-based mRNA vaccines, mRNA-1273
- Jackson LA
- Anderson EJ
- Rouphael NG
- et al.
,
- Baden LR
- El Sahly HM
- Essink B
- et al.
and BNT162b2,
- Walsh EE
- Frenck Jr, RW
- Falsey AR
- et al.
,
- Polack FP
- Thomas SJ
- Kitchin N
- et al.
also varied between the phase 1 and 3 trials. The safety profile of ARCoV in large-scale populations is under investigation. Previous studies
- Walsh EE
- Frenck Jr, RW
- Falsey AR
- et al.
,
- Mulligan MJ
- Lyke KE
- Kitchin N
- et al.
,
- Jackson LA
- Anderson EJ
- Rouphael NG
- et al.
showed that solicited systemic adverse events were more frequent and more severe at higher doses, which were consistent with our data. Meanwhile, several studies
- Walsh EE
- Frenck Jr, RW
- Falsey AR
- et al.
,
- Mulligan MJ
- Lyke KE
- Kitchin N
- et al.
,
- Jackson LA
- Anderson EJ
- Rouphael NG
- et al.
have reported more frequent and severe solicited systemic adverse events following the second vaccination than we found. However, this finding was not observed with ARCoV: the incidence of adverse events were similar after first and second vaccination.
- Khoury DS
- Cromer D
- Reynaldi A
- et al.
The immunogenicity of ARCoV was dose-dependent from 5 μg to 15 μg, but increasing the antigen dose from 20 μg to 25 μg did not improve immunogenicity, which was similar to BNT162b1 and BNT162b2.
- Walsh EE
- Frenck Jr, RW
- Falsey AR
- et al.
The underlying mechanism for this unusual phenotype remains to be determined and could partly be associated with the imbalance of host innate and adaptive immune responses.
- Linares-Fernandez S
- Lacroix C
- Exposito JY
- Verrier B
The SARS-CoV-2 RBD was identified as the key antigen to induce a strong T-helper-1-biased cellular response.
- Zhang NN
- Li XF
- Deng YQ
- et al.
In phase 1 trials, mRNA-based vaccines (ARCoV, BNT162b1)
- Li J
- Hui A
- Zhang X
- et al.
and adenovirus-vector vaccines (ChAdOx1,
- Folegatti PM
- Ewer KJ
- Aley PK
- et al.
Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine)
- Zhu FC
- Li YH
- Guan XH
- et al.
induced a strong T-helper-1-cell response in most participants. A primary goal of vaccination is to induce long-term immunity. In humans, T cells contribute to the resolution of SARS-CoV infection and can form a long-lasting memory response to SARS-CoV up to 11 years post-infection in recovered patients.
- Ng OW
- Chia A
- Tan AT
- et al.
For SARS-CoV-2, increasing evidence indicates that T cells play a major role in the resolution of COVID-19,
- Liao M
- Liu Y
- Yuan J
- et al.
,
and SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cells were detected in convalescent patients, even in exposed individuals who are seronegative.
,
- Sekine T
- Perez-Potti A
- Rivera-Ballesteros O
- et al.
Among cytokine profiles of spike-responsive memory T cells, production was dominated by the expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ that were highly expressed by CCR6− subsets.
,
- Rodda LB
- Netland J
- Shehata L
- et al.
However, presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in vaccinated participants is a promising sign that vaccination might give rise to immunity; but whether these T cells provide long-term protection remains to be tested.
This study has several limitations. First, data interpretation is based on a small sample size and more data from phase 2 and 3 trials will provide further data to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARCoV. Second, the trial was restricted to Chinese adult participants aged 18–59 years, and trials in older adults are taking place. Furthermore, the long-term safety and tolerability of ARCoV and persistence of the elicited immune responses is yet to be assessed; these aspects are being investigated strictly according to the study protocol.
In conclusion, this study confirmed the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profile of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, ARCoV. ARCoV has an excellent stability profile that can be stored and transported under refrigerated conditions, which is of great convenience for vaccine application to the public. A multi-regional phase 3 clinical trial is currently underway to test the efficacy of ARCoV.
L-JL and G-LC are the principal investigators of this trial. C-FQ, BY, ZH, and LW initiated, designed, and manufactured the vaccine candidate. ZH and S-YY designed the trial and study protocol. H-NG, G-PS, X-HD, NL, JS, Y-HG, Z-WS, K-QW, M-FZ, C-GP, and QJ contributed to operating the trial and participant safety. X-FL, Y-QD, HZ, N-NZ, and Y-FZ contributed to laboratory testing. M-LC, C-FQ, X-FL, HZ, Y-QD, S-YY, S-CC, Y-HL, D-HZ, X-HW, LN, H-HS, and CD contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing. All authors reviewed all the data and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and verified the data in the study, had full access to the data in the study, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2020YFC0842200, 2020YFA0707801), the Special Grant from AMS (JK2020NC002), the National Natural Science Foundation China (number 82041044), and Tsinghua University Spring Breeze Fund (2020Z99CFG008). C-FQ was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholar (number 81925025), and the Innovative Research Group (number 81621005) from the National Natural Science Foundation China, and the Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (number 2019-I2M-5-049) from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. We thank all participants in the trial and members of the data and safety monitoring board: Jielai Xia (Air Force Medical University), Xuanyi Wang (Fudan University), Dongliang Yang (Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Fuchun Zhang (The Eighth People’s Hospital of Guangzhou), and Panyong Mao (Department of Infectious Disease Medicine, Fifth Medical Center, PLA General Hospital). The members have expertise in infectious disease prevention and treatment, vaccine and drug development, epidemiology, and statistics.